RCVD – Remote Control Variable Discs

“Disc Golf is merely slow-motion saucer tech. Every throw is an experiment.” – Dr. Malachi Refaelov

Self-Contained Zulu Time

Operation Conductor Shadow: Power Lines, Ladera Ranch

Written by

Malachi Refaelov

in

RCVD Flight Test Report
Location: Power Lines – Ladera Ranch, CA

Filed by: Dr. Refaelov
Designation: RCVD Field Analyst – Unaccompanied Ops
Kit: GAB2100CD1A4 (RCVD: Yes, Power: H)

—

Mission Overview:
Solo disc telemetry testing conducted at the Ladera Ranch flight range (aka “Power Lines”), limited to Front 9 sectors due to temporal constraints. All throws were executed under light wind conditions, ensuring optimal disc tracking and flight curve integrity.

—

Environmental Conditions:

Wind: Light and variable – 1.34112 m/s WSW

Sky: Clear

Temperature: Mild – 346.15 Kelvin

Terrain: Elevation changes, standard suburban interference

Anomalies: Power lines present in test range; caution observed.

Paranormal Activity: None detected during this session.

—

Test Notes:

All discs returned post-flight; no losses recorded.

GAB2100CD1A4 watch functioned flawlessly; RCVD indicator was active throughout, allowing precision timestamp logging for each launch and landing.

No electromagnetic interference noted, despite proximity to above-ground power infrastructure.

Front 9 disc behavior remained within expected glide and fade tolerances.

—

Summary:
Successful solo recon and disc telemetry session. RCVD timing tech held sync with launch cadence. Flight telemetry remained consistent across all throws, with no disc losses and minimal sensor drift. Notably, test results came in at 2 over par on the front nine, attributed in part to exceptionally favorable wind conditions that extended glide paths and stabilized mid-flight disc behavior. No unexpected field phenomena encountered.As previously mentioned, temporal restraints prevented testing on the Back 9. Recommended future follow-up testing on Back 9 with General Jameson to validate comprehensive course response.

Filed under:
RCVD Mission Log #DR-20250406
Status: COMPLETE
Signature: [Digital Thumbprint Imprint – Verified]

Comments

3 responses to “Operation Conductor Shadow: Power Lines, Ladera Ranch”

  1. Thad “Razor” Pennington

    Wow—2 over par on the front nine? Incredible stuff. Really blazing new trails in mediocrity. And then just… stopping halfway? What happened—did the juice boxes run out? Or did the intense strain of amateur hour disc chucking under power lines prove too much? This really drives home the message: “We fear commitment, but love excuses.”

    And those UAP “tests”? Please. You strapped a G-Shock to a frisbee, tossed it toward a squirrel, and called it science. It’s like a middle school science fair threw up in a conspiracy forum. If you’re going to fake data, at least make it entertaining.

    Next time, try finishing the full course before launching a fake Pentagon briefing. Pro tip: Finish 18, break par, and stop blaming aliens for your garbage midrange game.

    Reply
    1. Malachi Refaelov

      Sir Pennington,

      Thank you for your spirited commentary on Operation Conductor Shadow. I do appreciate the passion with which you engage our work.

      You raise concerns regarding both the quality of our disc golf performance and the legitimacy of our Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) telemetry experiments. Allow me to address each point with the clarity and composure befitting actual research professionals.

      Firstly, regarding our score: While 2-over-par across the front nine may not impress those whose glory days peaked during the Eisenhower administration, our objective was observational data acquisition—not personal athletic validation. That said, I do hope your own disc golf career, should it exist beyond bluster, involves more than barking at clouds and yelling at squirrels.

      As for our UAP testing methodology, I regret that it failed to meet the rigorous standards of your “inter-dimensional disc auditing.” Unlike your apparent reliance on anecdotal bravado and garage folklore, our team employs real instruments, real telemetry, and real-world skepticism. If you found our methods juvenile, it may be because you mistook ingenuity for inexperience—an error not uncommon among those whose best ideas come with a VA discount.

      I invite you to submit your own peer-reviewed contributions to our journal, RCVD Notes, assuming of course you can format in APA and spell “phenomena” without assistance.

      With professional courtesy,

      Dr. Malachi Refaelov

      Reply
  2. Zeke Mooncloud

    Bro. I read your “Operation Conductor Shadow” write-up while hotboxing my Vanagon and even I had to put the joint down in disbelief. Two over par on the front nine? That’s not a score, that’s a cry for help. And you didn’t even finish the back nine? What happened—did your chakras get tangled in the power lines?

    And don’t get me started on those UAP tests. You seriously tossed a disc into the smog and called it “data”? My dog’s farts are more mysterious and better documented. You’re not doing science—you’re just LARPing X-Files with Ultimate Frisbee.

    Do us all a favor: next time, finish the damn round and leave the galactic nonsense to the dudes actually getting probed.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More posts